| # | Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) | Brief Description | Judgement |
| 1 | Prashant v/s State of NCT Delhi | under section 482 of the CRPC is allowed and section 376 (2)n of the IPC here by quashed | 24-11-20x1732115068.pdf View Judgement |
| 2 | Sunny Santosh @ dharmu V/s State of Maharastra | The conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC is altered to the one under Part I of Section 304 IPC. | 24-11-20x1732112635.pdf View Judgement |
| 3 | State Bank of India v/s Navin Kumar Sinha | no disciplinary proceeding can be initiated after the delinquent employee or officer retires from service on attaining the age of superannuation or after the extended period of service. | 24-11-19x1732026273.pdf View Judgement |
| 4 | Satendra Singh v/s State of uttar Pradesh and others | , even in an ex-parte inquiry, it is sine qua non to record the evidence of the witnesses for proving the charges, Supreme court | 24-11-19x1732026056.pdf View Judgement |
| 5 | Smt Saroj Kumre v/s state of MP | anticepatory bail in 498a and 420 of the IPC under umbrella of Arnesh Kumar case | 24-11-13x1731514261.pdf View Judgement |
| 6 | Tulsiram naik v/s State of uttar Pradesh | delay of filing the complainat case under section 138 o f NI act section 5 of the limitation act | 24-11-13x1731514085.pdf View Judgement |
| 7 | CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v/s ASHOK SHRIPAL | condition may amount on bail to defeating his right of appeal against the order of conviction, which may also violate his rights under Article 21 of the Constitution. | 24-11-04x1730731764.pdf View Judgement |
| 8 | Union of INdia v/S Shri B Dev 1998 | mis conduct is not always as a grave mis conducted | 24-10-27x1730041655.pdf View Judgement |
| 9 | Sita Ram Yadav V/s union of India and others | is liable for gratuity not for pension | 24-10-27x1730038735.pdf View Judgement |
| 10 | Julee Jain v/s State of MP and others | high court has passed the direction to provide protection to the petitioner who married against laws | 24-10-25x1729837334.pdf View Judgement |
| 11 | Shoor Singh V/s State of Uttrakhand | dowery death under section 304b, 498A of the IPC aqquitted by supreme court | 24-09-20x1726842130.pdf View Judgement |
| 12 | UP State Transport v/s Brijesh Kumar | hearing opportutinity in case of service is natural | 24-09-08x1725815400.pdf View Judgement |
| 13 | Chabi Karmakar v/s State of West Bengal | no case made out under section 304b and 306 of teh IPC | 24-09-08x1725813480.pdf View Judgement |
| 14 | Vaibhav Jain V/s Hindustan Motors | claim awarded by the supreme Court to the HIndustan Motors | 24-09-08x1725811759.pdf View Judgement |
| 15 | Jagdish v/s State of MP MCRC 6570/2015 INdore bench | section 3,7 o f the essential commidities act teh applicant is directed to release on bail becaus ethe maximum punishment is 7 years | 24-08-26x1724687841.pdf View Judgement |
| 16 | PrahladMAravi v/s State of MP and others | within a period of 60 days from submitting copy of the order and after passing a fresh order of absorption, all consequential benefits for which petitioner is entitled be also provided to him | 24-08-25x1724600542.pdf View Judgement |
| 17 | Kirtibhan Tiwari V/s State of MP and others | The HIghcourt Of MP has quashed the order of 498 a and its proceeding s were quashe | 24-08-18x1723963288.pdf View Judgement |
| 18 | Nand Kishore Sahu V/s State of MP and others | direction to decide represantation and within 60 days grant retireal dues | 24-08-16x1723823241.pdf View Judgement |
| 19 | Payal Makwana V/s Puneet Sharma | Supreme Court has quashed the Proceedings on the basis of compromise under section 498a and women voilance case | 24-08-14x1723650294.pdf View Judgement |
| 20 | Mahendra Kumar Sonkar V/s State of Madhya Pradesh | supreme Court Quash the proceedings under section 353 of the iPC | 24-08-14x1723650209.pdf View Judgement |
| 21 | Amit Tiwari Vs State of MP and others | Rajya Surksha Adhiniyam, High OCurt has quashed the order Zilabadar, externment of District Magistrate Jabalpur MP | 24-08-05x1722870780.pdf View Judgement |
| 22 | Deepak @ lallu V/s State of MP and others | order of externment/ zilabadar is quashed | 24-08-05x1722870216.pdf View Judgement |
| 23 | Lal Sahab Bairagi V/s State of MP and others WP no. 16549/2016 | no hearing opportunity is required while passing order, rule 8 (2) (3) of MP Civil Service | 24-08-04x1722777257.pdf View Judgement |
| 24 | D.V. Kapoor v/s Union of India | Release of pension and gratuity ..supreme Court | 24-08-01x1722486186.pdf View Judgement |
| 25 | Anil Gadhve v/s State of MP and others | direstion passed by INdore Bench to release pension benifit with in two months | 24-07-21x1721545676.pdf View Judgement |
| 26 | Ram Sewak Mishra V/s State of MP and others | hearing opportuinity must be given to the pensioner full bench judgment after convition case | 24-11-19x1732031872.pdf View Judgement |
| 27 | Vinesh Kumar Yadav V/s State of MP | cough syrup comes under drugs and costmetic act bail granted to0 the driver, because he knows nothing about the H1 commodities | 24-04-08x1712587688.pdf View Judgement |
| 28 | Ramesh Chandra Chouhan v/s State of MP | Petitioner s departmentle enquiry is pending and criminal case is registered hence directed to pay pension and Gratuity to the petitioner | 24-03-15x1710525798.pdf View Judgement |
| 29 | Rajendra Prasad Sharma V/s State of UP transport SLP (c) 12259/2018 | interim order to release gratuity and leave encashmet to the petitioner | 24-02-25x1708870590.pdf View Judgement |
| 30 | Rajendra Prasad Sharma v/s UP state (SLP) c 12259/2018 | state is directed to pay 2 lakh to the widow of teh appellant with interest | 24-02-25x1708870129.pdf View Judgement |
| 31 | Gulab Chand Jangde v/s State of MP and others WP 7032/ 2018 | the criminal prosecution cannot be deemed to be initiated against the petitioner merely on filing of the charge-sheet no cognizance has been taken even after retirement of the petitioner, respondents are directed torelease Gratuity and pension and other terminial dues to the petitioner | 24-02-25x1708868850.pdf View Judgement |
| 32 | Amit kewat v/s State of MP | Bail granted in posco case and DNA is matched | 24-01-22x1705933942.pdf View Judgement |
| 33 | The State of MP V/s Smt Lallo Bai | confiscation o f teh vechile - protection is provided for the owners of teh vechile, the said offence was committed without their knowledge or connivance. | 24-01-22x1705933585.pdf View Judgement |
| 34 | Asha Jain V/s State of MP and others | after conviction the honble court of MP has directed to respondents to pass the fresh order regarding pension and and last order quashed | 24-01-05x1704469051.pdf View Judgement |
| 35 | Heeralal Awasthi v/s State of MP and others WP no. 23807/22 | the petitioner was dismissed from the service after conviction hence respondent is directed to pay all benifits/amount which is not forfieted and he is also entitled for suspension amount etc | 24-01-05x1704462173.pdf View Judgement |
| 36 | Kailash Chandra v/s State of UP dairy no. 14383/2023 | surrending application exempted and sentence is suspended | 24-01-02x1704205962.pdf View Judgement |
| 37 | Sunil Gupta v/s State f MP | bail granted in 302, 201 /34 o fteh the iPC | 23-12-25x1703520494.pdf View Judgement |
| 38 | Bassappa V/s State of Karnataka and others . SC criminal appeal no. 678/2021 | respondent-State is relying upon this panchnama, we are surprised to note that only the accused No.1, who is the Secretary, has been implicated and not the Chairman of the Panchayat. accused aquitted and appeal allowed | 23-12-10x1702218184.pdf View Judgement |
| 39 | Rama Shankar Tiwari v/s State of MPand others | respondent is directed to grant GPF, GIS, Leave encashment, etc benifits to the petitioner who is dismissed from teh service after conviction from the Corruption case of Lokayukta | 23-12-08x1702051132.pdf View Judgement |
| 40 | Dr. Hira Lal v/s State of Bihar & Others | Direction to pay leave encashment and gratuity with other benefits to the petitioner on the time of pendency of criminal proceedings | 23-12-06x1701879017.pdf View Judgement |
| 41 | Dinesh Chandra Soni v/s State of Mp and others | the withdrawal order of pension was Quash and direction to pass the fresh order as per Radha Krishan case | 23-11-25x1700924219.pdf View Judgement |
| 42 | Pradeep Kumar Choudhary v/s State of Mp and others | PC act case, after Retirment the petitioner was convicted in corruption case. hence court has directed to pay FCF and leave encashment with GPF to the petitioner. | 23-11-14x1699970722.pdf View Judgement |
| 43 | Alok Mishra v/s State of MP | bail granted for the offence punishable u/s 409, 420 of teh IPC on deposit of entire amount | 23-10-09x1696860783.pdf View Judgement |
| 44 | JAMBOO BHANDARI v/s M.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. | The High Court, after hearing the parties, will consider whether 20% of the amount is already deposited or not | 23-10-08x1696749599.pdf View Judgement |
| 45 | Ku. Sangeeta Mishra v/s Kanchan Kala Kendra in criminal revision no. 3821/23 | notice issued in criminal revision of 138 NI act, and is directed to deposit the 50% of Compensation amount within 45 days of her release on bail | 23-10-05x1696515762.pdf View Judgement |
| 46 | Rekha Goyel v/s State of MP | 482 of the CRPC is dismissed, petitioner is the Nurse in the govt hospital against her under Sections 304 and 314 of IPC as well as Section 5 of Medical of Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 was registered | 23-09-21x1695305244.pdf View Judgement |
| 47 | Narendra Singh and others v/s State of Punjab | section 482 allowed FIR quashed on the basis of compromise under section 307,323, 324 of the IPC | 23-09-20x1695221153.pdf View Judgement |
| 48 | Jimmy Jahangir madan v/s Bolly kariappa | after died of the complainant in 138 of NI act u/s section 302 of the crpc is maintainable, | 23-09-13x1694615663.pdf View Judgement |
| 49 | chanda Dev Dagga v/s Manju k humantani | after died f complainant the legal heirs can file an application under section regarding continuation of the case | 23-09-13x1694615224.pdf View Judgement |
| 50 | Badelal Pathak V/s State of MP | after termination from service, the department is directed to grant GPF GIS Leave encashment etc to the petitioner | 23-09-13x1694613485.pdf View Judgement |
| 51 | Dr Naresh Prasad v/s State of Bihar criminal miscellaneous no. 39802/2008 | doctor is not liable for medical negligence | 23-09-10x1694343880.pdf View Judgement |
| 52 | poonam Verma v/s Ashwin Patel 1996(4) SCC 332 | Homopathic medical collage doctor is liable to pay fine to the deceased wife | 23-09-07x1694092471.pdf View Judgement |
| 53 | jacob methew v/s state of Punjab 2005(6) SCC 1 | doctor is not liable for the offence u/s 304 A of the IPc regarding negligence | 23-09-07x1694089874.pdf View Judgement |
| 54 | Moin khan V/s State of MP -MCRC no. 62546 /2021 | supradnama of vechile is granted under section 457 and order will not affect the confiscation proceeding (if any) pending before the Collector and the learned Court below has a right to seize the vehicle, in case, confiscation order is passed. | 23-09-05x1693889395.pdf View Judgement |
| 55 | Arunachala Gounder v/s Ponnusamy civil appeal 6659/2011 supreme court | If a Hindu women died without a will, her propery goes to her fathers heirs | 23-09-03x1693763842.pdf View Judgement |
| 56 | Dr. Deepa Sahai v/s State of Bihar and others | petitioners doctor cannot be charged criminally in view of the protections given under Sections 88, 92 and 93 of the Indian Penal Code | 23-08-27x1693147947.pdf View Judgement |
| 57 | Suraj Pratap Singh v/s Chairman Managing Director | after acquittal the respondent is directed, to release all benefits which was forfeited | 23-08-22x1692685302.pdf View Judgement |
| 58 | Najma Bee V/s Narcotic SLP 1042/2023 | under gone 2/3 o f sentence | 23-08-22x1692684487.pdf View Judgement |
| 59 | Vishambhar Diwedi and others v/s State of MP | in non- compoundable offence under section 326 of the IPC , the entire proceedings are quashed on the basic of compromise. | 23-08-14x1692023511.pdf View Judgement |
| 60 | Damodar S Prabhu V/s Syed Bablal 2010 | Direction for deposits in compromise case in 138 of the NI act there is 10 % in District , 15 % in High Court , 20 % in Supreme Court | 23-08-09x1691589209.pdf View Judgement |
| 61 | The Secreatry v/s K. Chandran etc Supreme Court | judgment is of issue of gratuity | 23-07-23x1690126412.pdf View Judgement |
| 62 | Chhotelal Choudhary v/s State of MP | jail sentence can be reduced to 9 months instead of 4 yrs the period which the appellant has already undergone in the custody | 23-07-23x1690107623.pdf View Judgement |
| 63 | Popular Muthiah v/s State of Tamil Nadu 2006 (5) SC 210 | power to compromise in non compoundable case ,exercising its revisional or appellate power, may exercise its inherent powers. | 23-07-15x1689404503.pdf View Judgement |
| 64 | Basar Kamal V/s State of MP | compromise in non compoundable offence us 354 of IPC and 8 of POSCO act | 23-07-14x1689320817.pdf View Judgement |
| 65 | M/s Mitra v/s Chief Election Commission and others | the petitioner can approach the Collector-cum-District Election Officer and can raise dispute before the said authority in view of the terms and condition of the agreement. | 23-07-14x1689314790.pdf View Judgement |
| 66 | Smt Suman Vishwakarma v/s state of mp and others | direction to the police inspector to investigate the matter fairly | 23-07-14x1689314215.pdf View Judgement |
| 67 | Benson v/s state pf Kerla 2016 (10) SCC 307 | sentence in different crimes shall run con | 23-07-11x1689086884.pdf View Judgement |
| 68 | VK Bansal v/s State of Haryana Supreme Court | section 482, 427 of teh CRPC both sentence run con | 23-07-11x1689084862.pdf View Judgement |
| 69 | BHUVANSINGH WASKEL v/s STATE OF MP AND OTHER | direction to department to give all benifits to the petitioner , after conviction | 23-07-06x1688654526.pdf View Judgement |
| 70 | Rajshri Shukla v/s State of MP and others | direction to police and Tehsildar for demargation of land | 23-07-06x1688654316.pdf View Judgement |
| 71 | Sachin PArmar V/s State of MP | Right to cross-examine a witness cannot be curtailed, Court holds trial court should be patient and tolerant in their approach towards the Trial Court lawyers... | 23-06-11x1686468528.pdf View Judgement |
| 72 | balli @ daulat Singh v/s state of mp ILR 2013 | section 25 and 27 of Arms act fire arm seizued but not kept in safe costudy and no record of malkhana | 23-05-13x1684001762.pdf View Judgement |
| 73 | Amit kewat v/s State of MP and others | offence under section 376(2) n, 363, 366, of IPC and 7,8,6 of POSCO act is quashed by using power under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure by HIgh Court OF MP | 23-04-01x1680369082.pdf View Judgement |
| 74 | Neeraj Dutta V/s State (government of N.C.T. of Delhi | Aqquital for the offence punishable under section 7, 13 (1)d 13(2) & 12 of prevention of correcption act | 23-03-31x1680206235.pdf View Judgement |
| 75 | [IN REFERENCE (SUO MOTO) VS. CHAIRMAN, STATE BAR COUNCIL OF M.P. & OTHERS] | order and direction in case of Strike of Advocates | 23-03-29x1680104056.pdf View Judgement |
| 76 | CBI Vs Anupam J. Kulkarni | Police Remand can not be exceed 15 Days | 23-03-21x1679384295.pdf View Judgement |
| 77 | State of MP Vs Rustum | Computation of period of 60/90 Days Section 167 | 23-03-21x1679384183.pdf View Judgement |
| 78 | State of UP Vs Singhara Singh | Section 164 by necessary implication prohibts the magistrate from giving oral evidence of confession made to him | 23-03-21x1679383744.pdf View Judgement |
| 79 | Satya Pal Singh Vs State of MP | Father of deceased victim has right to apply | 23-03-21x1679383481.pdf View Judgement |
| 80 | Shiv Shankar Singh Vs State of Bihar | Filing of Multiple FIR | 23-03-21x1679383303.pdf View Judgement |
| 81 | Chanmuniya Vs Virendra kumar Singh Kushwaha | Right of maintenance in Live in Relationship | 23-03-21x1679383063.pdf View Judgement |
| 82 | Joginder Kumar Vs State of UP | SC Guidelines relating to rights of the arrested person | 23-03-21x1679382810.pdf View Judgement |
| 83 | Sheela Basera Vs State of Maharashtra | Right of Women retaing to arrest | 23-03-21x1679382471.pdf View Judgement |
| 84 | Nilabati Bahera Vs State of Orissa | Compensation in case of unlawfull arrest and detention | 23-03-21x1679382085.pdf View Judgement |
| 85 | Mohd. Ahmad Khan Vs Shah Bano Begum | Section 125 of CrPC Secular | 23-03-21x1679381474.pdf View Judgement |
| 86 | Lalita kumari Vs State of M.P | FIR mandatory in congnizable cases | 23-03-21x1679381102.pdf View Judgement |
| 87 | Ravish Sood v/s State of MP | tempropery bail to the applicant on the basic of preganancy of his wife, 3 months temprory bail granted | 23-03-17x1679034086.pdf View Judgement |
| 88 | Shubham Nahare V/s State of Mp | anticepatory bail to the applicant husbandfor the offence punishable u/s 306 of the IPC | 23-03-17x1679033267.pdf View Judgement |
| 89 | D.K. basu v/s state of westbengal | land mark judgements regardig the rights of arrest person, the Supreme Court has passed teh guideline to all investigaitng officers of India | 23-03-17x1679032541.pdf View Judgement |
| 90 | Surat Singh V/s State of uttaranchal and others | Supreme court quashed the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court on the basis of compromise between the party. | 23-02-27x1677478086.pdf View Judgement |
| 91 | Minta v/s State of Punjab | compromise in non compoundable offence after conviction | 23-02-27x1677479544.pdf View Judgement |
| 92 | Prashant V/s the state rep, Madras | Proceedings is Quashed in POSCO case | 23-02-25x1677348675.pdf View Judgement |
| 93 | S. Satish Kumar V/s The state rep, villore | compromise in POSCO case due to parties were married and proceedings quashed | 23-02-25x1677348442.pdf View Judgement |
| 94 | Pareshbhai Ashwinkumar Mittal Versus State of Gujarat and Others | the cheque in question had been issued by the applicant - accused as partner of the partnership firm. A partnership firm being a juristic person, the obserations of the Supreme Court would apply with an equal force in the instant case inasmuch as the partnership firm was required to be joined as an accused in absence of which the complaint would not be maintainable. | 23-02-21x1676990664.pdf View Judgement |
| 95 | Amar Singh Bagdi Vs State of M.P. | Dismiss in PC case Petitioner is Directed to file appeal before Department under rule 23 | 23-02-16x1676557899.pdf View Judgement |
| 96 | Radha Krishna Sharma v/s State of MP and others | In pension matter the petitioner was found guilty by the trial court an dhis pension was withdrawn, the division bench of gwalior has directed that pension cannot be stopped and passed the direction to issue it | 23-02-13x1676295411.pdf View Judgement |
| 97 | Deokinndan V/s State of Bihar 1971 | pension is a propety | 23-08-10x1691676579.pdf View Judgement |
| 98 | Union Of India vs Alapan Bandyopadhyay on 6 January, 2022.html | Section 25 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 | 23-01-29x1675002777.pdf View Judgement |
| 99 | Hamdard National Foundation ... vs Sadar Laboratories Pvt. Limited on 6 January, 2022.html | Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC | 23-01-29x1675002638.pdf View Judgement |
| 100 | harsh Sehgal V/s state and others 2022 | section 148 of NI Act regarding deposit of fine amount 20% | 23-01-22x1674329677.pdf View Judgement |
| 101 | Sunita Palita and others v/s smt panchami store and others sLP cr. 10396 / 2019 | section 141 of the negotibale Instrument act, no vicarious liabileties, ever person is not liable for the offence punishable under section 138 NI act | 23-01-21x1674267089.pdf View Judgement |
| 102 | Bharti V/s state of haryana | appellant aqquited on the basic of compromise section 354, 451 of the IPC | 23-01-18x1674063688.pdf View Judgement |
| 103 | DEEPAK @ LALLU S/O VIJAY KEWAT,WP 25822 2021 | essential ingredients of the provisions of Section 5 of the MP rajya Surkshya Adhiniyam 1990 are not fulfilled, therefore, the entire action of the externment is construed , the order of the externment of district collector is quashed | 23-01-18x1674023008.pdf View Judgement |
| 104 | Dilip Hariramani v. Bank of Baroda, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 579, | Partner can not punished under section 138 of NI act | 23-01-18x1674022344.pdf View Judgement |
| 105 | Neelkanth Kahate V/S state of MP in WP no. 20681/2022 dated 14/11/2022 | penson benifits :- after dismissal from service the direction passed to file appeal before department | 23-01-18x1674002908.pdf View Judgement |
| 106 | Ram Kishan V/s State of Uttar Pradesh wp no. 14570/2009 order dated 01/01/2020 | after dismissal from service the police department directed to reinstate in service with all benifits Allahabad High court | 23-01-18x1674001648.pdf View Judgement |
| 107 | Pawan Kumar vs Union Of India on 2 May, 2022 | companasate oppoinment Respondents are directed to reinstate the appellant in service on the post of Constable on which he was selected pursuant to his participation in reference to employment | 23-01-10x1673362140.pdf View Judgement |
| 108 | State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 8 July, 1947 | department cannot recover amount from pension | 23-01-08x1673191942.pdf View Judgement |
| 109 | State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014 | .... | 23-01-08x1673191790.pdf View Judgement |
| 110 | State Of Punjab vs Baldev Singh on 21 July, 1999 | NDPS not Complainance of section 50 | 23-01-06x1672987238.pdf View Judgement |
| 111 | Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat on 29 October, 2010 | NDPS not Complainance of section 50 | 23-01-06x1672987126.pdf View Judgement |
| 112 | sanjeet kumar singh munna kumar singh v/s tate-of chhattisgarh 30 aug 2022 | NDPS act (Benifit of Doubt) | 23-01-06x1672985774.pdf View Judgement |
| 113 | Radheshyam Kantaram Yadav And ... vs State Of Gujarat on 11 February, 2003 | Under Secsion 498 of the IPC | 23-01-05x1672910135.pdf View Judgement |
| 114 | Nirode Ranjan Acharjee vs State Of Tripura on 21 June, 2006 | Under Secsion 306 of the IPC | 23-01-05x1672909990.pdf View Judgement |
| 115 | Balkrishna Pandurang Moghe vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 5 March, 1998 | Under Section 498A Of the IPC | 23-01-05x1672909403.pdf View Judgement |
| 116 | Pranab Kumar Chakraborty vs Smt. Kumkum Chakraborty on 5 July, 2005 | Under Secssion 498A of the IPC | 23-01-05x1672909077.pdf View Judgement |
| 117 | Smt. Chandra Kiran Choudhary And ... vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 29 April, 2003 | Under Section 498a of IPC | 23-01-05x1672908933.pdf View Judgement |
| 118 | Ms. Nidhi Kaushik vs Union Of India & Ors. on 26 May, 2014 | Under Section 498 Of IPC | 23-01-05x1672908786.pdf View Judgement |
| 119 | Dr.Satheesh N.V. vs The State Of Kerala on 15 July, 2009 | Under Section 489A of IPC | 23-01-05x1672908504.pdf View Judgement |
| 120 | Amar Pal And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Anr. on 19 June, 2007 | Under Section 489of IPC | 23-01-05x1672908257.pdf View Judgement |
| 121 | Brijendra Kumar Misra vs State Of U.P.And 3 Ors. on 31 August, 2018 | Under Secsion 438, 304 Of IPC | 23-01-05x1672907935.pdf View Judgement |
| 122 | Savitri Sarang (Aged About 64 vs Bhajan Lal And Others on 1 August, 2022 | Undr Section 482 of IPC | 23-01-05x1672907817.pdf View Judgement |
| 123 | Devaki Nandan Prasad vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 22 April, 1983 | pension after conviction supreme court | 23-01-03x1672758449.pdf View Judgement |
| 124 | State Tr.P.S.Lodhi Colony,New ... vs Sanjeev Nanda on 3 August, 2012 | UNDER SECTION 304 OF IPC | 22-12-31x1672498288.pdf View Judgement |
| 125 | Udai Singh vs State on 2 December, 2008 | UNDER SECTION 302 OF IPC | 22-12-31x1672496313.pdf View Judgement |
| 126 | State Of U.P vs Santosh Kumar & Ors on 3 September, 2009 | UNDER SECTION 304B IPC | 22-12-31x1672496171.pdf View Judgement |
| 127 | Mahadev Prasad Kaushik vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2008 | under section 304 IPC | 22-12-31x1672495981.pdf View Judgement |
| 128 | Shamnsaheb M.Multtani vs State Of Karnataka on 24 January, 2001 | Unser Section 304B of IPC | 22-12-31x1672478945.pdf View Judgement |
| 129 | Videocon Industries Limited ... vs Ram Raj Bhandari & Ors. on 23 December, 2022.html | Under Section 34 IPC | 22-12-29x1672327844.pdf View Judgement |
| 130 | Abhishek Bhuwalka vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 23 December, 2022.html | Under Section 34 IPC | 22-12-29x1672327659.pdf View Judgement |
| 131 | Ruksar And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 7 July, 2022.html | Under Section 319 IPC | 22-12-29x1672327391.pdf View Judgement |
| 132 | Smt. Salma vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ... on 11 July, 2022.html | Under Section 319 IP C | 22-12-29x1672327283.pdf View Judgement |
| 133 | Zarina V/s State OF MP | section 41 of the code of criminal procedure , arrest of accused when a suspect is arrested and produced before a Magistrate for authorising detention, the Magistrate has to address the question whether specific reasons have been recorded for arrest and if so, prima facie those reasons are relevant, and secondly, a reasonable conclusion could at all be reached by the police officer that one or the other conditions stated above are attracted. To this limited extent the Magistrate will make judicial scrutiny"5. | 22-12-28x1672248828.pdf View Judgement |
| 134 | Ramasankar Kushwaha And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. on 29 October, 2021.html | Under sections 147, 328/149, 302/149, 201 of IPC | 22-12-26x1672038137.pdf View Judgement |
| 135 | Smt. Alka Rai W_O Late Krishna Nand ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ... on 23 May, 2006.html | Under Section 302,307 of IPC | 22-12-26x1672037905.pdf View Judgement |
| 136 | Dharambir And Others vs State Of Haryana on 13 July, 2012.html | Under Section 302 of IPC | 22-12-26x1672037112.pdf View Judgement |
| 137 | Mohanan vs State Of Kerala on 16 December, 2009.html | Under Section 302, 307 of IPC | 22-12-26x1672034498.pdf View Judgement |
| 138 | SHRI PUNEET Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA | Juvenile Justice Act 2015 | 22-12-25x1671962697.pdf View Judgement |
| 139 | Devi Lal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 February, 2021 | Juvenile Justice Act 2015 | 22-12-25x1671961702.pdf View Judgement |
| 140 | Gaurav vs State Of U P And Another on 29 July 2022 | Juvenile Justice Act 2015 | 22-12-25x1671961069.pdf View Judgement |
| 141 | Radhika (Juvenile) vs State Of U.P. on 5 August, 2019 | Juvenile Justice Act 2015 | 22-12-25x1671960688.pdf View Judgement |
| 142 | Umrao Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 June, 2022.h | Under Section 302. 325 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671954026.pdf View Judgement |
| 143 | G M Krishna @ Krishna Kumar @ Shani ... vs State Of Karnataka By on 5 August, 2020.html | Under Section 302, 323 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671953598.pdf View Judgement |
| 144 | 5 Whether It Is To Be Circulated To ... vs State Of ... on 17 July, 2014 | Under Section 302, 498 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671953234.pdf View Judgement |
| 145 | Rafeek Ahmed vs State on 9 July, 2009.html | Under Section 302 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671953013.pdf View Judgement |
| 146 | Bali Choudhary & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 17 December, 2008.html | Under Section 302, 149 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671952717.pdf View Judgement |
| 147 | Udai Singh vs State on 2 December, 2008.html | Section 302,304 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671952542.pdf View Judgement |
| 148 | Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 July, 2005.html | Section 498A of IPC | 22-12-25x1671951875.pdf View Judgement |
| 149 | Sukhwant Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 29 September, 2022.html | Undr Section 307, 482, 320 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671951753.pdf View Judgement |
| 150 | Ajit And Others vs State Of Haryana And Otehrs on 29 September 2022. | Under Section 320 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671951584.pdf View Judgement |
| 151 | Rachhpal Singh Rashpal Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 29 September 2022 | Umdr Section 320 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671951304.pdf View Judgement |
| 152 | Vimal Mahajan And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 20 September 2022 | Under Section 320 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671951098.pdf View Judgement |
| 153 | Chhintu Chandan And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Another on 14 July 2022. | ....... | 22-12-25x1671950890.pdf View Judgement |
| 154 | Abdul Sajid Abdul Sadiq vs State Of Maharashtra on_20 March 2003 | Under Secion 320 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671950523.pdf View Judgement |
| 155 | Gangadhar Behidar vs State Of Orissa on 21 November, 1994.html | Under section 324 of IPC | 22-12-25x1671950066.pdf View Judgement |
| 156 | Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs State Of West Bengal on 11 November, 2009 | Under Section 306, 107 Of IPC | 22-12-22x1671701123.pdf View Judgement |
| 157 | S.S.Chheena vs Vijay Kumar Mahajan & Anr on 12 August, 2010 | Under Section 306,107 | 22-12-22x1671700986.pdf View Judgement |
| 158 | S. Pratap Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 2 September, 1963 | Service Matter | 22-12-22x1671700555.pdf View Judgement |
| 159 | K.K. Modi vs K.N. Modi & Ors on 4 February, 1998 | Arbitration Act | 22-12-22x1671700252.pdf View Judgement |
| 160 | Sahu Madho Das And Others vs Pandit Mukand Ram And Another(And ... on 22 March, 1955 | Family Matter | 22-12-22x1671700081.pdf View Judgement |
| 161 | Aniruddhsinh Mahipatsinh Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 14 August, 2001 | Constitution of India, Articles 19, 32, 226 - Prison excesses- Rights of Prisoner and Duties of the Court. | 22-12-22x1671699909.pdf View Judgement |
| 162 | Santhini vs Vijaya Venketesh on 8 September, 2017 | Family Mattter under section 498 | 22-12-22x1671699653.pdf View Judgement |
| 163 | Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd vs Miral Kanaksinh Thakore on 7 January, 2014 | condonation of delay | 22-12-22x1671699249.pdf View Judgement |
| 164 | Esha Bhattacharjee vs Mg.Commit.Of Raghunathpur Nafar ... on 13 September, 2013 | condonation of delay | 22-12-22x1671698935.pdf View Judgement |
| 165 | V. Sivamurthy & Anr vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 12 August, 2008 | Compassionate appointment | 22-12-22x1671697970.pdf View Judgement |
| 166 | Rebati Kumar Mandal vs State Of West Bengal | With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is allowed | 22-12-22x1671697502.pdf View Judgement |
| 167 | Khem Chand vs State Of Delhi | .. | 22-12-22x1671695004.pdf View Judgement |
| 168 | State Of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Jawnmal Gandhi | .. | 22-12-22x1671694775.pdf View Judgement |
| 169 | State Of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Jawnmal Gandhi | .. | 22-12-22x1671694773.pdf View Judgement |
| 170 | Renu Sharma vs Anand Rahul Singh | .. | 22-12-22x1671694474.pdf View Judgement |
| 171 | Kulwinder Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab | .. | 22-12-22x1671694158.pdf View Judgement |
| 172 | Sanjay A. Mehta vs Anar Sanjay Mehta on 22 February, 2007 | Family Mattter under section 498 | 22-12-22x1671699502.pdf View Judgement |
| 173 | Sikkim State vs Snagay Sherpa | offence under section 376 of IPC | 22-12-22x1671693709.pdf View Judgement |
| 174 | Tarkeshwar Sahu vs State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) | The appeal filed by the appellant is partly allowed under section 376 and Posco. | 22-12-22x1671693490.pdf View Judgement |
| 175 | Madan Gopal Kakkad vs Naval Dubey | Appeal is allowed matter is about 376 Posco | 22-12-22x1671693363.pdf View Judgement |
| 176 | SREEJA T. vs RAJAPRABHA KERALA AT ERNAKULAM | the order of maintenance passed by the Family Court is modified | 22-12-21x1671603648.pdf View Judgement |
| 177 | Sunderbha1 Ambalal Desai vs State Of Gujarat | supurdnama | 22-12-19x1671430539.pdf View Judgement |
| 178 | Shiji Pappu Ors vs Radhika | in non compoundable compromise between the parties is indeed a relevant circumstance which the Court may keep in mind. | 22-12-16x1671200307.pdf View Judgement |
| 179 | The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Laxmi Narayan | in non compoundable compromise between the parties is indeed a relevant circumstance which the Court may keep in mind. | 22-12-16x1671173158.pdf View Judgement |
| 180 | Dr Mohd Ibrahim And Ors vs State Of U.P. | n view of aforesaid discussions, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed on the basis of the compromise dated 28.07.2021. The summoning order dated 27.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Barabanki in Case No. 2514 of 2016 arising out of charge-sheet No. A-133/16 dated 31.05.2016 filed in case Crime No. 0176 of 2016 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 427, 307 IPC, Police Station Safdarganj, District Barabanki including the entire proceedings initiated thereafter are hereby quashed | 22-12-16x1671172497.pdf View Judgement |
| 181 | Uma Singh Vs State of M.P. | offence punihable only with maximum 07 years , strictly directed to complince arenesh kumar guideline | 22-12-12x1670859800.pdf View Judgement |
| 182 | State Of Chhattisgarh vs Lekhram | an entry in the school register is not conclusive but it has evidentiary value. Such evidentiary value of a school register is corroborated by oral evidence as the same was recorded on the basis of the statement of the mother of the prosecutrix | 22-12-12x1670857329.pdf View Judgement |
| 183 | Alamelu Anr vs State Rep By Inspector Of Police | "The age of a person as recorded in the school register or otherwise may be used for various purposes, namely, for obtaining admission; for obtaining an appointment; for contesting election; registration of marriage; , the age of the girl could not have been fixed on the basis of the transfer certificate. There was no reliable evidence to vouchsafe the correctness of the date of birth as recorded in the transfer certificate. The expert evidence does not rule out the possibility of the girl being a major | 22-12-12x1670854520.pdf View Judgement |
| 184 | Chandrabhan Vs State Of M.P. | applicant/ accuced protective umbrella of anticeptory bail | 22-12-12x1670853860.pdf View Judgement |
| 185 | Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar Anr | judgment protect the accused not to arrest, offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine | 22-12-12x1670853532.pdf View Judgement |
| 186 | Shri Dilip K Basu Etc Ashok K vs State Of West Bengal | land mark judgement, illegal detintion guidelines passed y the supreme court | 22-12-12x1670852664.pdf View Judgement |
| 187 | Ramsingbhai Saburbhai Patelvs StateOf Gujarat and others | In view of the discussion above, the petition is allowed. The order of termination dated 04.06.2019 is quashed and set aside and the petitioner shall be reinstated in service on his original post with all consequential benefits and backwages. Reinstatement shall be granted within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the consequential benefits to be paid within two weeks thereafter | 22-12-11x1670749386.pdf View Judgement |
| 188 | Dhirendra Kumar Dubey vsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh and others | As such, the impugned order (Annexure P/1) being completely without jurisdiction, cannot be sustained and is, accordingly, set aside. Respondents are directed to pay the retiral dues including pension, gratuity etc. to the petitioner in accordance with the Rules of 1976 | 22-12-11x1670749219.pdf View Judgement |
| 189 | Ramlal Sharma vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors on 27 November 2015 | This brings me to the question of non-payment of leave encashment and balance salary against suspension period as the petitioner claimed the same in the instant writ petition. The respondent No.3 would consider and pass a reasoned order with regard to leave encashment and balance salary against his suspension period as no provision has been brought to notice of this court by which amount of leave encashment and salary against suspension period can be withheld during pendency of judicial proceedings within thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated hereinabove. No order as to cost(s) | 22-12-11x1670747181.pdf View Judgement |
| 190 | DR. HIRA LAL (S) Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. | The State is directed to release 90% of the gratuity payable to the Appellant within a period of 12 weeks from the date of this judgment. The balance 10% will be released subject to the outcome of the criminal proceedings pending against him in R.C. Case No. 48A/1996 | 22-12-11x1670746401.pdf View Judgement |
| 191 | Smt. Mohani Devi & Anr. … | In the result, the appeal is allowed. The judgment dated 19.11.2018 passed in D.B. Special Appeal(W) No.1261/2018 upholding the order dated 01.11.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2839 of 2012 is set aside. The gratuity amount as directed above shall be paid to respondent No.1 in terms of the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 within four weeks from this date. | 22-12-11x1670746104.pdf View Judgement |
| 192 | Yogeshbhai Rupabhai Vatukiya vs State Of Gujarat on 26 November 2020 | In view of above fact situation and position of law, impugned order dated 20.2.2020 passed by the respondent No.2 - Collector, Surat is hereby quashed and set aside and the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order on the original post with similar service conditions to make up total five years period as per the original appointment period. It is further made clear that the petitioner shall not entitled to any monetary benefits or salary for the intervening period and the respondents are not precluded from proceeding against the petitioner in accordance with law for the alleged misconduct. | 22-12-11x1670745963.pdf View Judgement |
| 193 | Dev Prakash Tewari | The appeals are, therefore, allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and the respondents are directed to pay arrears of salary and allowances payable to the appellant and also to pay him his all the retiral benefits in accordance with the rules and regulations as if there had been no disciplinary proceeding or order passed therein. No costs. | 22-12-11x1670745782.pdf View Judgement |
| 194 | State Of Jharkhand Ors vs Jitendra Kumar Srivastava Anr on 14 August 2013 | This Court in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ranojirao Shinde and Anr. MANU/SC/0030/1968 : [1968]3SCR489 had to consider the question whether a "cash grant" is "property" within the meaning of that expression in Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(1) of the Constitution. This Court held that it was property, observing "it is obvious that a right to sum of money is property | 22-12-11x1670742264.pdf View Judgement |
| 195 | Shankar Das Vs Union Of India | Constitution of India 1950, Article 311 (2) and Probation of Offenders Act 1958, Sections 3,4 and 12- Employee-Prosecuted and convicted for breach of trustReleased under the Probation of Offenders Act-Dismissed from service summarily consequent upon conviction-Dismissal order whether permissible and valid-Right to impose penalty carries with it a duty to act justly | 24-11-18x1731942093.pdf View Judgement |
| 196 | KANHAIYALAL DAMDE | under prevention of corruption act, Pension cannotbe stop by the department and is directed to release pension benifits | 22-12-11x1670739506.pdf View Judgement |
| 197 | Shripathi & Others Vs State of Karnatak Supreme Court | Section 34 of the IPC, regarding common intention not made out and appellant were acquitted | 24-11-18x1731944433.pdf View Judgement |
| 198 | Mohan Raikwar Vs State of M.P | Maintainability of Second Bail | 22-12-09x1670567854.pdf View Judgement |
